Force-Velocity Relationship of Upper Body Muscles: Traditional Versus Ballistic Bench Press

J Appl Biomech. 2016 Apr;32(2):178-85. doi: 10.1123/jab.2015-0162. Epub 2015 Nov 3.

Abstract

This study aimed to (1) evaluate the linearity of the force-velocity relationship, as well as the reliability of maximum force (F0), maximum velocity (V0), slope (a), and maximum power (P0); (2) compare these parameters between the traditional and ballistic bench press (BP); and (3) determine the correlation of F0 with the directly measured BP 1-repetition maximum (1RM). Thirty-two men randomly performed 2 sessions of traditional BP and 2 sessions of ballistic BP during 2 consecutive weeks. Both the maximum and mean values of force and velocity were recorded when loaded by 20-70% of 1RM. All force-velocity relationships were strongly linear (r > .99). While F0 and P0 were highly reliable (ICC: 0.91-0.96, CV: 3.8-5.1%), lower reliability was observed for V0 and a (ICC: 0.49-0.81, CV: 6.6-11.8%). Trivial differences between exercises were found for F0 (ES: < 0.2), however the a was higher for the traditional BP (ES: 0.68-0.94), and V0 (ES: 1.04-1.48) and P0 (ES: 0.65-0.72) for the ballistic BP. The F0 strongly correlated with BP 1RM (r: 0.915-0.938). The force-velocity relationship is useful to assess the upper body maximal capabilities to generate force, velocity, and power.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Computer Simulation
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Models, Biological
  • Movement / physiology
  • Muscle Contraction / physiology*
  • Muscle, Skeletal / physiology*
  • Physical Conditioning, Human / methods*
  • Physical Exertion / physiology
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Stress, Mechanical
  • Torso / physiology*
  • Weight Lifting / physiology*
  • Weight-Bearing / physiology*
  • Young Adult