Evita's lobotomy

Abstract

For 60 years, the details about Eva Perón's illness and lobotomy at the end of her life have been obscured from the public. Here, we examine the sociopolitical factors that may have contributed to this secrecy. The first involves Eva Perón's political status and the personality cult surrounding her image, including partisan efforts to present her as a patron saint of Peronism. The second involves the social perceptions, which are often stigmatizing, regarding disease in political or public figures. Notably, neuropsychiatric illness and associated indications for treatment were viewed as oligarchic by the Perón regime, and admission to a lobotomy may have been perceived as anti-Peronist. A third factor involves the growing ignominy of prefrontal lobotomy as a surgical modality, which may have precluded operative exposés. A final factor may be that Eva Perón's lobotomy was in fact performed for behavior and personality modification, and not just for pain control. A brief history of lobotomy is presented, highlighting its adoption as a procedural panacea for psychiatric illnesses, relief of intractable pain from cancer, and management of belligerent behavior, and its subsequent fall from clinical favor. Although a shroud of secrecy still surrounds Eva Perón's prefrontal lobotomy, these factors provide a potential rationale for the circumstances, as well as foster a discussion of cultural elements that may still play a role in the public perception of psychosurgery today.

Keywords: Cultural perceptions of illness; Eva Perón; Frontal lobotomy; George Udvarhelyi; James Poppen; Medical professionalism; Psychosurgery.