Systematic review of the efficacy in seizure control and safety of neuronavigation in epilepsy surgery: The need for well-designed prospective studies

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of surgery with neuronavigation compared to conventional neurosurgical treatment of epilepsy in terms of safety and seizure outcomes and to assess the quality of the evidence base of neuronavigation in this clinical context.

Method: Systematic review using the electronic databases of Cochrane, CRD, PubMed, Embase, SciELO and LILACS in Portuguese, English and Spanish. The [MeSH] terms included "epilepsy" and "neuronavigation".

Eligibility criteria: Studies assessing surgery with neuronavigation for the surgical treatment of epilepsy or brain injuries associated with epileptic seizures.

Results: We identified 28 original articles. All articles yielded scientific evidence of low quality. Outcome data presented in the articles identified was heterogeneous and did not amount to compelling evidence that epilepsy surgery with neuronavigation produces higher rates of seizure control, a reduced need for reoperations, or lower rates of complications or postoperative neurological deficits.

Conclusion: We were unable to find any publications providing convincing evidence that neuronavigation improves outcomes of epilepsy surgery. Whilst this does not mean that neuronavigation cannot improve neurosurgical outcomes in this clinical setting, well-designed research studies evaluating the role of neuronavigation are urgently needed.

Keywords: Neuroimaging; Neurological deficits; Outcome; Resection; Risk.