Infection Profiles of Selected Aquabirnavirus Isolates in CHSE Cells

PLoS One. 2015 Aug 11;10(8):e0134173. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134173. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

The wide host range and antigenic diversity of aquabirnaviruses are reflected by the presence of a collection of isolates with different sero- and genotypic properties that have previously been classified as such. Differences in cytopathogenic mechanisms and host responses induced by these isolates have not been previously examined. In the present study, we investigated infection profiles induced by genetically and serologically closely related as well as distant isolates in-vitro. CHSE-214 cells were infected with either E1S (serotype A3, genogroup 3), VR-299 (serotype A1, genogroup 1), highly virulent Sp (TA) or avirulent Sp (PT) (serotype A2, genogroup 5). The experiments were performed at temperatures most optimum for each of the isolates namely 15°C for VR-299, TA and PT strains and 20°C for E1S. Differences in virus loads and ability to induce cytopathic effect, inhibition of protein synthesis, apoptosis, and induction of IFNa, Mx1, PKR or TNFα gene expression at different times post infection were examined. The results showed on one hand, E1S with the highest ability to replicate, induce apoptosis and IFNa gene expression while VR-299 inhibited protein synthesis and induced Mx1 and PKR gene expression the most. The two Sp isolates induced the highest TNFα gene expression but differed in their ability to replicate, inhibit protein synthesis, and induce gene expression, with TA being more superior. Collectively, these findings point towards the adaptation by different virus isolates to suit environments and hosts that they patronize. Furthermore, the results also suggest that genetic identity is not prerequisite to functional similarities thus results of one aquabirnavirus isolate cannot necessarily be extrapolated to another.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Aquabirnavirus / isolation & purification*
  • Aquabirnavirus / physiology
  • Cell Line
  • Cytopathogenic Effect, Viral
  • Fish Diseases / genetics
  • Fish Diseases / metabolism
  • Fish Diseases / virology*
  • Gene Expression
  • Host-Pathogen Interactions
  • Interferon Type I / metabolism
  • Virus Replication

Substances

  • Interferon Type I

Grants and funding

This study was supported by funds from the Norwegian University of Life Sciences "Aquaculture initiative" and partly by the Research Council of Norway (RCN) project no. 183204 "Indo-Norwegian platform on fish and shellfish vaccine development (VaccInAqua)". The grant recipient was ØE. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.