Comparative Analysis of Cartilage Marker Gene Expression Patterns during Axolotl and Xenopus Limb Regeneration

PLoS One. 2015 Jul 17;10(7):e0133375. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133375. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

Axolotls (Ambystoma mexicanum) can completely regenerate lost limbs, whereas Xenopus laevis frogs cannot. During limb regeneration, a blastema is first formed at the amputation plane. It is thought that this regeneration blastema forms a limb by mechanisms similar to those of a developing embryonic limb bud. Furthermore, Xenopus laevis frogs can form a blastema after amputation; however, the blastema results in a terminal cone-shaped cartilaginous structure called a "spike." The causes of this patterning defect in Xenopus frog limb regeneration were explored. We hypothesized that differences in chondrogenesis may underlie the patterning defect. Thus, we focused on chondrogenesis. Chondrogenesis marker genes, type I and type II collagen, were compared in regenerative and nonregenerative environments. There were marked differences between axolotls and Xenopus in the expression pattern of these chondrogenesis-associated genes. The relative deficit in the chondrogenic capacity of Xenopus blastema cells may account for the absence of total limb regenerative capacity.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Ambystoma mexicanum / genetics*
  • Ambystoma mexicanum / growth & development
  • Animals
  • Biomarkers / metabolism*
  • Cartilage / growth & development*
  • Cartilage / metabolism*
  • Cell Differentiation
  • Collagen / genetics
  • Collagen / metabolism
  • Extremities / growth & development*
  • Female
  • Fracture Healing / genetics
  • Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental*
  • Limb Buds / metabolism
  • Male
  • Regeneration / genetics*
  • Xenopus laevis / genetics*
  • Xenopus laevis / growth & development

Substances

  • Biomarkers
  • Collagen

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas (No. 25124707 to Akira S.) and Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows (No. 15J07688 to KM), http://www.jsps.go.jp/. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.