Background: Early treatment responses are important prognostic factors in childhood T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) patients. The predictive values of early treatment responses in Chinese childhood T-ALL patients were still unknown.
Methods: From January 2003 to December 2012, 74 consecutive patients aged ≤ 15 years with newly diagnosed T-ALL were treated with BCH-2003 protocol or CCLG-2008 protocol in the Department of Pediatric, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital in China. Predictive values of early treatment responses, including prednisone response, bone marrow morphology at day 15 and day 33 during induction chemotherapy, and minimal residual disease (MRD) monitored by flow cytometry after induction therapy (time point 1, TP1) and before consolidation therapy (time point 2, TP2), were analyzed.
Results: The 5-year event free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) rates for these patients were 62.5% (SE, 6.4) and 62.7% (SE, 6.6), respectively. Prednisone poor responder was strongly associated with increased chance of induction failure (14.8%) and decreased survival rate (5 year EFS rate, 51.1 % (SE, 10.5)). Patients with ≥ 25% blast cells in bone marrow at day 15 were more likely to have an inferior outcome. 93.2% of the T-ALL patients achieved complete remission at day 33 while patients with resistant disease all died of disease progression. MRD ≥ 10(-2) at TP1 or MRD ≥ 10(-3) at TP2 was significantly related to dismal prognosis. Risk groups classified by MRD at two time points could stratify patients into different groups: 29.0% of the patients were MRD standard risk (MRD < 10(-4) at both time points) with 3-year EFS rate of 100%, 29.0% were MRD high risk (MRD ≥ 10(-2) at TP1 or MRD ≥ 10(-2) at TP2) with 3-year EFS rate of 55.6% (SE, 16.6) , and the rest of patients were defined as MRD intermediate risk with 3-year EFS rate of 85.7% (SE, 13.2).
Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that MRD was the most powerful predictor of treatment outcome in childhood T-ALL patients and conventional morphological assessments of treatment response still played important roles in predicting treatment outcome and tailoring treatment intensity especially in countries with inadequate skills or financial resources for MRD monitoring.