Objective: To compare the findings in rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-affected joints between (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and (18)F-fluoride (NaF) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT).
Methods: We enrolled twelve RA patients who started a new biologic agent (naïve 9 and switch 3). At entry, both hands were examined by (18)F-FDG PET/CT, (18)F-NaF PET/CT, and X-ray. Intensity of PET signals was determined by standardized uptake value max (SUVmax) in metacarpophalangeal (MCP), proximal interphalangeal (PIP), and ulnar, medial, and radial regions of the wrists. Hand X-rays were evaluated according to the Genant-modified Sharp score at baseline and 6 months.
Results: Both (18)F-FDG and (18)F-NaF accumulated in RA-affected joints. The SUVmax of (18)F-FDG correlated with that of (18)F-NaF in individual joints (r = 0.65), though detail distribution was different between two tracers. (18)F-NaF and (18)F-FDG signals were mainly located in the bone and the surrounding soft tissues, respectively. The sum of SUVmax of (18)F-NaF correlated with disease activity score in 28 joint (DAS28), modified health assessment questionnaire (MHAQ), and radiographic progression. (18)F-FDG and (18)F-NaF signals were associated with the presence of erosions, particularly progressive ones.
Conclusion: Our data show that both (18)F-FDG and (18)F-NaF PET signals were associated with RA-affected joints, especially those with ongoing erosive changes.
Keywords: 18F-FDG PET; 18F-NaF PET; Bone turnover; Rheumatoid arthritis.