Impact of micropulsed ultrasound power settings on the efficiency and chatter associated with lens-fragment removal

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Jun;41(6):1264-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.09.049. Epub 2015 Jun 19.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the optimum power settings in micropulsed ultrasound (US).

Setting: John A. Moran Eye Center Laboratories, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

Design: Experimental study.

Methods: Pig lenses hardened to be comparable to dense human cataracts were cut into 2.0 mm cubes and removed using micropulsed longitudinal US with previously optimized settings (6 milliseconds on and 6 milliseconds off and using a 0.9 mm 30-degree beveled bent phaco tip). The aspiration was set at 40 mL/min and the vacuum level at 550 mm Hg. Twenty lens cubes were tested with the power set from 10% to 100% in increments of 10%. Primary outcome measures were efficiency time (time to lens removal) and chatter (number of times the lens fragment visibly bounced off the tip).

Results: Efficiency time decreased with increasing power. There was a correlation between power and efficiency time (R(2) = 0.41, P = .046), which was more substantial between 30% and 100% power (R(2) = 0.71, P = .004). The mean number of chatter events did not differ significantly between power settings (R(2) = 0.012, P = .1195).

Conclusions: There was a 5-fold increase in efficiency between 10% power and 20% power, which likely indicates that there is a minimum power threshold for efficient breakup of the lens. Between 20% and 100% power, there was a linear, strong, and statistically significant improvement in efficiency in these lens fragments. In addition, with micropulsed US there was little chatter or microchatter throughout the power range.

Financial disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • High-Energy Shock Waves*
  • Lens, Crystalline / surgery*
  • Operative Time
  • Phacoemulsification / instrumentation*
  • Swine
  • Ultrasonics / standards*