The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefits of the addition of platinum agents for the treatment of patients with triple-negative breast cancer on the basis of randomized-controlled trials (RCTs). A fully recursive literature search was performed in the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register Databases, Medline, EMBASE, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database in any language. RCTs were considered for inclusion. Eight randomized-controlled trials totaling 1142 patients were included. The objective response rate was reported in six RCTs, which were divided into two subgroups: palliative chemotherapy for a metastatic setting and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Using the fixed-effects model, the difference between the platinum-based group and the non-platinum-based group was found to be statistically significant in the overall study [relative risk (RR)=1.36, P<0.00001], the subgroup of palliative chemotherapy (RR=2.42, P<0.00001), and the subgroup of neoadjuvant (RR=1.15, P=0.01). Pathological complete response rates were based on five studies, and the results between the platinum-based group and the non-platinum-based group also reached statistical significance both in the fixed-effects model (RR=1.43, P<0.0001) and in the random-effects model (RR=1.47, P=0.01). The results seemed to yield a better response rate and pathological complete response rate for platinum-based therapy in triple-negative breast cancer. However, because of the heterogeneous nature of primary trial outcomes, caution should be exercised in coming to this conclusion and further research is necessary to support these findings.