Purpose: To evaluate the adjunctive clinical effects of a chloramine to non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis.
Material and methods: Eighteen individuals diagnosed with peri-implantitis (clinical signs of inflammation and progressive bone loss) on at least two implants were included. Clinical variables; plaque accumulation (Pl), probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL) and bleeding on probing (BoP), were recorded at baseline and at 3-month follow-up. Primary clinical efficacy variable was the change in the number of sites with BoP. The implants were randomized into two different treatment groups: test and control. Both implants received supra- and submucosal debridement by ultrasonic instrumentation supplemented with hand instruments. The implants assigned to the test group first received local applications of a chloramine gel (Perisolv™ ; RLS Global AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) followed by mechanical instrumentation. The oral hygiene was checked at 6 weeks.
Results: After 3 months, implants of both groups showed statistically significant reduction (P < 0.001) in the number of BoP-positive sites compared with baseline. The reduction of BoP-positive sites in the test group changed from 0.97 (SD ± 0.12) to 0.38 (SD ± 0.46), and in the control group from 0.97 (SD ± 0.12) to 0.31 (SD ± 0.42). Between-group comparisons revealed no statistically significant differences at baseline and after 3 months, for BoP or any of the other variables.
Conclusion: In the present randomized clinical trial of peri-implantitis therapy; non-surgical mechanical debridement with adjunctive use of a chloramine is equally effective in the reduction of mucosal inflammation as conventional non-surgical mechanical debridement up to 3 months.
Keywords: chloramine; non-surgical therapy; peri-implantitis; surface decontamination.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.