Twice cutting method reduces tibial cutting error in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Knee. 2016 Jan;23(1):173-6. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2014.11.015. Epub 2014 Dec 7.

Abstract

Background: Bone cutting error can be one of the causes of malalignment in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). The amount of cutting error in total knee arthroplasty has been reported. However, none have investigated cutting error in UKA. The purpose of this study was to reveal the amount of cutting error in UKA when open cutting guide was used and clarify whether cutting the tibia horizontally twice using the same cutting guide reduced the cutting errors in UKA.

Methods: We measured the alignment of the tibial cutting guides, the first-cut cutting surfaces and the second cut cutting surfaces using the navigation system in 50 UKAs. Cutting error was defined as the angular difference between the cutting guide and cutting surface.

Results: The mean absolute first-cut cutting error was 1.9° (1.1° varus) in the coronal plane and 1.1° (0.6° anterior slope) in the sagittal plane, whereas the mean absolute second-cut cutting error was 1.1° (0.6° varus) in the coronal plane and 1.1° (0.4° anterior slope) in the sagittal plane. Cutting the tibia horizontally twice reduced the cutting errors in the coronal plane significantly (P<0.05).

Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that in UKA, cutting the tibia horizontally twice using the same cutting guide reduced cutting error in the coronal plane.

Keywords: Computer-assisted navigation system; Cutting error; Tibial alignment; Twice cutting method; Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / methods*
  • Bone Malalignment / prevention & control*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Knee Joint / surgery*
  • Knee Prosthesis*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Osteoarthritis, Knee / surgery*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Surgery, Computer-Assisted / methods*
  • Tibia / surgery*
  • Treatment Outcome