Prognostic factors for low rectal cancer patients undergoing intersphincteric resection after neoadjuvant chemoradiation

J Surg Oncol. 2015 Jun;111(8):1054-8. doi: 10.1002/jso.23932. Epub 2015 May 14.

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate prognostic factors for low rectal cancer patients undergoing intersphincteric resection (ISR) following neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT).

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 163 primary rectal cancer patients without distant metastasis who underwent ISR following neoadjuvant CRT between January 2006 and December 2011. Prognostic factors for disease-free survival (DFS) and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) were evaluated.

Results: The median follow-up period was 53 months (range, 0-82 months). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated different 3-year DFS (stage 0, 96.2%; I, 84.8%; II, 72.9%; III, 38.0%) and 3-year LRFS (stage 0, 100.0%; I, 92.4%; II, 91.1%; III, 70.9%) according to pathologic TNM stages, particularly stage III. Multivariable Cox regression analysis suggested that DFS was associated with ypT (3/4 vs. 0/1/2) and ypN (1/2 vs. 0) stages, whereas LRFS with ypN stage (1/2 vs. 0), tumor size (≥3.5 cm vs. <3.5 cm), and tumor height from the anal verge (≤2 cm vs. >2 cm).

Conclusions: ISR following CRT could be feasible in stage-I and II low rectal cancer patients, but might be related to poor oncologic outcomes in those with stage-III disease. The indication for ISR or abdominoperineal resection should be carefully evaluated in cases of low rectal cancer with suspicious lymph node metastasis after CRT.

Keywords: chemoradiation; intersphincteric resection; prognosis; rectal cancer; recurrence.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Anal Canal / surgery*
  • Chemoradiotherapy*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Lymph Nodes
  • Lymphatic Metastasis
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoadjuvant Therapy
  • Prognosis
  • Rectal Neoplasms / pathology
  • Rectal Neoplasms / surgery
  • Rectal Neoplasms / therapy*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Survival Analysis