Benefits of Turbid River Plume Habitat for Lake Erie Yellow Perch (Perca flavescens) Recruitment Determined by Juvenile to Larval Genotype Assignment

PLoS One. 2015 May 8;10(5):e0125234. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125234. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

Nutrient-rich, turbid river plumes that are common to large lakes and coastal marine ecosystems have been hypothesized to benefit survival of fish during early life stages by increasing food availability and (or) reducing vulnerability to visual predators. However, evidence that river plumes truly benefit the recruitment process remains meager for both freshwater and marine fishes. Here, we use genotype assignment between juvenile and larval yellow perch (Perca flavescens) from western Lake Erie to estimate and compare recruitment to the age-0 juvenile stage for larvae residing inside the highly turbid, south-shore Maumee River plume versus those occupying the less turbid, more northerly Detroit River plume. Bayesian genotype assignment of a mixed assemblage of juvenile (age-0) yellow perch to putative larval source populations established that recruitment of larvae was higher from the turbid Maumee River plume than for the less turbid Detroit River plume during 2006 and 2007, but not in 2008. Our findings add to the growing evidence that turbid river plumes can indeed enhance survival of fish larvae to recruited life stages, and also demonstrate how novel population genetic analyses of early life stages can contribute to determining critical early life stage processes in the fish recruitment process.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Alleles
  • Animals
  • Ecosystem*
  • Genetics, Population
  • Genotype
  • Geography
  • Heterozygote
  • Lakes*
  • Larva / genetics
  • Microsatellite Repeats / genetics
  • Nephelometry and Turbidimetry
  • Perches / genetics*
  • Perches / growth & development*
  • Rivers*
  • Water Movements

Associated data

  • Dryad/10.5061/dryad.VF0T2

Grants and funding

Funding for this research was provided by 1) Great Lakes Fishery Commission’s Fisheries (GLFC) Research Program (http://www.glfc.org/research/FisheryDesc.php), grant #00012267: no individuals employed or contracted by the GLFC played any role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript; 2) Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada Discovery Grant #814014 (http://www.nserc-crsng.gc.ca/index_eng.asp): no individuals employed or contracted by the NSERC played any role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript; and 3) Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (OMNR) base funds (https://www.ontario.ca/environment-and-energy/aquatic-research): no individuals employed or contracted by the OMNR (other than co-author T.B. Johnson) played any role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.