Protein identification and quantification from riverbank grape, Vitis riparia: Comparing SDS-PAGE and FASP-GPF techniques for shotgun proteomic analysis

Proteomics. 2015 Sep;15(17):3061-5. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201500085. Epub 2015 Jun 22.

Abstract

Protein sample preparation optimisation is critical for establishing reproducible high throughput proteomic analysis. In this study, two different fractionation sample preparation techniques (in-gel digestion and in-solution digestion) for shotgun proteomics were used to quantitatively compare proteins identified in Vitis riparia leaf samples. The total number of proteins and peptides identified were compared between filter aided sample preparation (FASP) coupled with gas phase fractionation (GPF) and SDS-PAGE methods. There was a 24% increase in the total number of reproducibly identified proteins when FASP-GPF was used. FASP-GPF is more reproducible, less expensive and a better method than SDS-PAGE for shotgun proteomics of grapevine samples as it significantly increases protein identification across biological replicates. Total peptide and protein information from the two fractionation techniques is available in PRIDE with the identifier PXD001399 (http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org/dataset/PXD001399).

Keywords: Filter Aided Sample Preparation (FASP); Gas Phase Fractionation (GPF); Grapevine; Label-free quantitative shotgun proteomics; Plant proteomics; Vitis riparia.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Chemical Fractionation / methods*
  • Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel / methods*
  • Peptides / analysis
  • Peptides / chemistry
  • Plant Proteins / analysis*
  • Plant Proteins / metabolism
  • Proteomics / methods*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Vitis / chemistry*
  • Vitis / metabolism

Substances

  • Peptides
  • Plant Proteins