Comparison of manual and automated cultures of bone marrow stromal cells for bone tissue engineering

J Biosci Bioeng. 2015 Nov;120(5):570-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2015.03.011. Epub 2015 Apr 20.

Abstract

The development of an automated cell culture system would allow stable and economical cell processing for wider clinical applications in the field of regenerative medicine. However, it is crucial to determine whether the cells obtained by automated culture are comparable to those generated by manual culture. In the present study, we focused on the primary culture process of bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) for bone tissue engineering and investigated the feasibility of its automation using a commercially available automated cell culture system in a clinical setting. A comparison of the harvested BMSCs from manual and automated cultures using clinically acceptable protocols showed no differences in cell yields, viabilities, surface marker expression profiles, and in vivo osteogenic abilities. Cells cultured with this system also did not show malignant transformation and the automated process was revealed to be safe in terms of microbial contamination. Taken together, the automated procedure described in this report provides an approach to clinical bone tissue engineering.

Keywords: Automated cell culture system; Bone marrow stromal cells; Bone tissue engineering; Osteogenic potential; Regenerative medicine.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Automation / methods*
  • Bone Marrow Cells / cytology*
  • Bone and Bones / cytology*
  • Cell Culture Techniques / methods*
  • Cell Survival
  • Cell Transformation, Neoplastic
  • Feasibility Studies
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Mesenchymal Stem Cells / cytology*
  • Osteogenesis
  • Regenerative Medicine
  • Tissue Engineering*