Can pathologic complete response (pCR) be used as a surrogate marker of survival after neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer?

Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2015 Jul;95(1):88-104. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2015.02.011. Epub 2015 Mar 4.

Abstract

Breast cancer is heterogeneous in clinical, morphological, immunohistochemical and biological features, as reflected by several different prognostic subgroups. Neoadjuvant approaches are currently used for the "in vivo" efficacy assessment of treatments. Pathological complete response (pCR) has been reported as a reliable predictive factor of survival in that setting. However, pCR remains a subject of controversy in terms of definition and its evaluation methods. In addition, its predictive value for patient outcome in various breast cancer biological subtypes has been under debate. In this review, we will present the existing definitions of pCR, the impact of its evaluation methods on its rate and the assessment of its predictive value for patient outcome in the molecular subtypes of breast cancer (luminal A and B, Triple Negative and HER2-positive).

Keywords: Breast cancer sugroups; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Pathologic complete response; Surrogate marker.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Biomarkers, Tumor / analysis
  • Breast / pathology*
  • Breast Neoplasms / diagnosis
  • Breast Neoplasms / pathology*
  • Breast Neoplasms / therapy*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Neoadjuvant Therapy* / methods
  • Prognosis
  • Receptor, ErbB-2 / analysis
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Biomarkers, Tumor
  • Receptor, ErbB-2