Objective: To perform a population-based study that evaluates contemporary racial disparities in the morbidity profile of patients undergoing radical nephrectomy in the United States.
Methods: Using the Premier hospital database (Premier Inc, Charlotte, NC), which collects data from over 600 nonfederal hospitals throughout the United States, we identified patients undergoing a total nephrectomy as their primary procedure and also had a concurrent diagnosis of a kidney mass or cancer from 2003 to 2010. The primary outcome was 90-day major complication rates, based on the Clavien classification system. Multivariate logistic regression models were performed, adjusting for clustering by hospitals and survey weighting to ensure nationally representative estimates.
Results: The study population included 25,517 patients translating into a weighted sample of 185,135 radical nephrectomies. In a multivariate model including patient, hospital, and surgical characteristics, blacks were more commonly associated with a major complication (odds ratio, 2.1; P <.0001). When we incorporated Charlson comorbidity score into the model, the racial disparity in major complications was attenuated by 36% (odds ratio, 1.7; P <.0001). Adjusting for annual surgical volume in the multivariate model did not alter results.
Conclusion: Our contemporary evaluation of patients undergoing radical nephrectomy in the United States demonstrates that blacks are associated with a markedly elevated rate of major complications as compared to whites. This disparity is possibly a result of unequal access to routine health care.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.