Laser photogrammetry improves size and demographic estimates for whale sharks

PeerJ. 2015 Apr 7:3:e886. doi: 10.7717/peerj.886. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

Whale sharks Rhincodon typus are globally threatened, but a lack of biological and demographic information hampers an accurate assessment of their vulnerability to further decline or capacity to recover. We used laser photogrammetry at two aggregation sites to obtain more accurate size estimates of free-swimming whale sharks compared to visual estimates, allowing improved estimates of biological parameters. Individual whale sharks ranged from 432-917 cm total length (TL) (mean ± SD = 673 ± 118.8 cm, N = 122) in southern Mozambique and from 420-990 cm TL (mean ± SD = 641 ± 133 cm, N = 46) in Tanzania. By combining measurements of stranded individuals with photogrammetry measurements of free-swimming sharks, we calculated length at 50% maturity for males in Mozambique at 916 cm TL. Repeat measurements of individual whale sharks measured over periods from 347-1,068 days yielded implausible growth rates, suggesting that the growth increment over this period was not large enough to be detected using laser photogrammetry, and that the method is best applied to estimating growth rates over longer (decadal) time periods. The sex ratio of both populations was biased towards males (74% in Mozambique, 89% in Tanzania), the majority of which were immature (98% in Mozambique, 94% in Tanzania). The population structure for these two aggregations was similar to most other documented whale shark aggregations around the world. Information on small (<400 cm) whale sharks, mature individuals, and females in this region is lacking, but necessary to inform conservation initiatives for this globally threatened species.

Keywords: Africa; Age & growth; Conservation biology; Elasmobranch.

Grants and funding

This study was supported by the Shark Foundation, GLC Charitable Trust, Rufford Small Grants (grant 23.12.08), Project AWARE International, Ocean Revolution, Fondation Ensemble, WWF Tanzania (grant CN74) and one anonymous donor. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.