Purpose: Detection of bone metastases in breast and prostate cancer patients remains a major clinical challenge. The aim of the current trial was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of (99m)Tc-hydroxymethane diphosphonate ((99m)Tc-HDP) planar bone scintigraphy (BS), (99m)Tc-HDP SPECT, (99m)Tc-HDP SPECT/CT, (18)F-NaF PET/CT and whole body 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including diffusion weighted imaging, (wbMRI+DWI) for the detection of bone metastases in high risk breast and prostate cancer patients.
Material and methods: Twenty-six breast and 27 prostate cancer patients at high risk of bone metastases underwent (99m)Tc-HDP BS, (99m)Tc-HDP SPECT, (99m)Tc-HDP SPECT/CT, (18)F-NaF PET/CT and wbMRI+DWI. Five independent reviewers interpreted each individual modality without the knowledge of other imaging findings. The final metastatic status was based on the consensus reading, clinical and imaging follow-up (minimal and maximal follow-up time was 6, and 32 months, respectively). The bone findings were compared on patient-, region-, and lesion-level.
Results: (99m)Tc-HDP BS was false negative in four patients. In the region-based analysis, sensitivity values for (99m)Tc-HDP BS, (99m)Tc-HDP SPECT, (99m)Tc-HDP SPECT/CT, (18)F-NaF PET/CT, and wbMRI+DWI were 62%, 74%, 85%, 93%, and 91%, respectively. The number of equivocal findings for (99m)Tc-HDP BS, (99m)Tc-HDP SPECT, (99m)Tc-HDP SPECT/CT, (18)F-NaF PET/CT and wbMRI+DWI was 50, 44, 5, 6, and 4, respectively.
Conclusion: wbMRI+DWI showed similar diagnostic accuracy to (18)F-NaF PET/CT and outperformed (99m)Tc-HDP SPECT/CT, and (99m)Tc-HDP BS.