Axisymmetric versus three-dimensional finite element models for predicting the attenuation of earplugs in rigid walled ear canals

J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Dec;134(6):4470. doi: 10.1121/1.4826182.

Abstract

The axisymmetric hypothesis of the earplug-ear canal system geometry is commonly used. The validity of this hypothesis is investigated numerically in the case of a simplified configuration where the system is embedded in a rigid baffle and for fixed boundary conditions on the earplug lateral walls. This investigation is discussed for both individual and averaged insertion loss predictions of molded silicon earplugs. The insertion losses of 15 earplug-ear canal systems with realistic geometries are calculated using three-dimensional (3D) finite element models and compared with the insertion losses provided by two-dimensional equivalent axisymmetric finite element models using 6 different geometry reconstruction methods [all the models are solved using COMSOL Multiphysics (COMSOL, Sweden)]. These methods are then compared in order to find the most reliable ones in terms of insertion loss predictions in this simplified configuration. Two methods have emerged: The usage of a variable cross section (with the same area values as the 3D case) or the usage of a constant cross section (with the same length and volume as the 3D case).

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Computer Simulation*
  • Computer-Aided Design*
  • Ear Canal / anatomy & histology*
  • Ear Canal / physiology*
  • Ear Protective Devices*
  • Equipment Design
  • Finite Element Analysis
  • Humans
  • Models, Anatomic*
  • Models, Biological*
  • Noise / prevention & control*
  • Numerical Analysis, Computer-Assisted
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Silicones

Substances

  • Silicones