No decreased infection rate when using antibiotic-impregnated cement in primary total joint arthroplasty

Orthopedics. 2014 Dec;37(12):839-45. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20141124-07.

Abstract

There has been much debate and controversy about the routine use of antibiotic-impregnated bone cement in primary total joint arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to undertake a meta-analysis to determine whether the use of antibiotic-impregnated bone cement would reduce the incidence of infection after primary total joint arthroplasty. Of 313 citations identified for screening, 6 trials reporting 26,791 patients were eligible for data extraction and meta-analysis. The authors found no statistically significant difference between antibiotic-impregnated bone cement and plain bone cement in terms of the incidence of infection. The results indicated that the use of antibiotic-impregnated bone cement in primary total joint arthroplasty did not lead to a decrease in the rate of infection.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / administration & dosage*
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / therapeutic use
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement / methods*
  • Bone Cements*
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Joint Prosthesis / adverse effects*
  • Prosthesis-Related Infections / epidemiology
  • Prosthesis-Related Infections / etiology
  • Prosthesis-Related Infections / prevention & control*

Substances

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents
  • Bone Cements