Consumers believe nutrition facts labeling for added sugar will be more helpful than confusing

Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014 Dec;22(12):2481-4. doi: 10.1002/oby.20887.

Abstract

Objective: Consumer beliefs regarding the usefulness of information about added sugars proposed for addition to the Nutrition Facts panel on U.S. food labeling were assessed.

Methods: A representative sample of 500 U.S. adults was recruited in July 2014 for an anonymous, voluntary online survey. Respondents were shown a Nutrition Facts panel with added sugars included and were asked how helpful or confusing the added sugars information would be and why. A 5-point scale captured responses about helpfulness, and reasons were captured as free text. Descriptive statistics were calculated and multi-linear regression performed to determine whether any demographic variables were statistically significant predictors of survey responses.

Results: A clear majority (63%) of respondents indicated that knowing the amount of added sugar in a food product would be helpful. Relatively few (18%) thought it would be confusing. None of the demographic variables were statistically significant, with the exception of gender. Being female was a statistically significant predictor of how helpful the information was perceived to be (P < 0.03).

Conclusions: Most consumers believed food labeling for added sugars will be more helpful than confusing.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Confusion*
  • Consumer Behavior / statistics & numerical data*
  • Culture
  • Data Collection
  • Dietary Carbohydrates / standards*
  • Female
  • Food Labeling / trends*
  • Humans
  • Linear Models
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Nutrition Policy / trends*
  • Online Systems
  • Sex Factors
  • United States

Substances

  • Dietary Carbohydrates