What prolongs a butterfly's life?: Trade-offs between dormancy, fecundity and body size

PLoS One. 2014 Nov 12;9(11):e111955. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111955. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

In butterflies, life span often increases only at the expense of fecundity. Prolonged life span, on the other hand, provides more opportunities for oviposition. Here, we studied the association between life span and summer dormancy in two closely related species of Palearctic Meadow Brown butterflies, the endemic Maniola nurag and the widespread M. jurtina, from two climatic provenances, a Mediterranean and a Central European site, and tested the relationships between longevity, body size and fecundity. We experimentally induced summer dormancy and hence prolonged the butterflies' life in order to study the effects of such a prolonged life. We were able to modulate longevity only in Mediterranean females by rearing them under summer photoperiodic conditions (light 16 h : dark 8 h), thereby more than doubling their natural life span, to up to 246 days. Central European individuals kept their natural average live span under all treatments, as did Mediterranean individuals under autumn treatment (light 11: dark 13). Body size only had a significant effect in the smaller species, M. nurag, where it affected the duration of dormancy and lifetime fecundity. In the larger species, M. jurtina, a prolonged adult life span did, surprisingly, not convey any fecundity loss. In M. nurag, which generally deposited fewer eggs, extended life had a fecundity cost. We conclude that Mediterranen M. jurtina butterflies have an extraordinary plasticity in aging which allows them to extend life span in response to adverse environmental conditions and relieve the time limitation on egg-laying while maintaining egg production at equal levels.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Body Size*
  • Butterflies / physiology*
  • Environment
  • Europe
  • Female
  • Fertility / physiology*
  • Longevity / physiology*
  • Models, Theoretical
  • Oviposition
  • Phenotype
  • Reproduction
  • Seasons
  • Species Specificity
  • Time Factors

Associated data

  • figshare/10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.1194965

Grants and funding

This study was funded by an Elise Richter grant number V169-B17 from the Austrian Science Foundation (Fonds zur Förderung von Wissenschaft und Forschung) to Andrea Grill and a scholarship by the University of Vienna to E. Haeler. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.