A study of remitted and treatment-resistant depression using MMPI and including pessimism and optimism scales

PLoS One. 2014 Oct 3;9(10):e109137. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109137. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

Background: The psychological aspects of treatment-resistant and remitted depression are not well documented.

Methods: We administered the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) to patients with treatment-resistant depression (n = 34), remitted depression (n = 25), acute depression (n = 21), and healthy controls (n = 64). Pessimism and optimism were also evaluated by MMPI.

Results: ANOVA and post-hoc tests demonstrated that patients with treatment-resistant and acute depression showed similarly high scores for frequent scale (F), hypochondriasis, depression, conversion hysteria, psychopathic device, paranoia, psychasthenia and schizophrenia on the MMPI compared with normal controls. Patients with treatment-resistant depression, but not acute depression registered high on the scale for cannot say answer. Using Student's t-test, patients with remitted depression registered higher on depression and social introversion scales, compared with normal controls. For pessimism and optimism, patients with treatment-resistant depression demonstrated similar changes to acutely depressed patients. Remitted depression patients showed lower optimism than normal controls by Student's t-test, even though these patients were deemed recovered from depression using HAM-D.

Conclusions: The patients with remitted depression and treatment-resistant depression showed subtle alterations on the MMPI, which may explain the hidden psychological features in these cohorts.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Cohort Studies
  • Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant / psychology*
  • Humans
  • Optimism / psychology*
  • Personality Inventory
  • Pessimism / psychology*

Grants and funding

Funding for this study was provided by Teikyo University Chiba Medical Center, Ichihara, Japan. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.