Background: Pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG) has been performed to reduce postprandial symptoms for some early gastric cancer (EGC) cases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible advantages after PPG for middle-third EGC in comparison with distal gastrectomy.
Materials and methods: We searched Medline, Embase, and Science Citation Index Expanded for relevant studies. Statistical analyses were conducted to calculate the summary weighted mean differences (WMDs) and odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) using random-effects models.
Results: We identified 15 nonrandomized controlled trials (16 studies) with 1774 patients, which consisted of 11 studies for conventional PPG (CPPG) versus conventional distal gastrectomy (CDG) and 5 studies for laparoscopy-assisted PPG (LAPPG) versus laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG). Meta-analysis of CPPG versus CDG revealed that CPPG had the advantage of prevention of early dumping syndrome (OR=0.18; 95% CI 0.12, 0.27), gastritis (OR=0.19; 95% CI 0.07, 0.53), duodenal juice reflux (OR=0.20; 95% CI 0.06, 0.66), and regaining of weight (WMD=3.53; 95% CI 2.34, 4.72). However, the incidence of gastric stasis was higher in the CPPG group than in the CDG group (OR=1.70; 95% CI 1.13, 2.57). Meta-analysis of LAPPG versus LADG revealed that LAPPG shortened the operation time (WMD=-21.12; 95% CI -31.33, -10.90) and did not increase the occurrence of postoperative complication (OR=0.72; 95% CI 0.41, 1.27).
Conclusions: With the benefits of prevention of early dumping syndrome, duodenal juice reflux, gastritis, and regaining of weight, PPG can be an excellent option for middle-third EGC.