The economics of medicines optimization: policy developments, remaining challenges and research priorities

Br Med Bull. 2014 Sep;111(1):45-61. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldu021.

Abstract

Background: This review scopes the evidence on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interventions to improve suboptimal use of medicines in order to determine the evidence gaps and help inform research priorities.

Sources of data: Systematic searches of the National Health Service (NHS) Economic Evaluation Database, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects.

Areas of agreement: The majority of the studies evaluated interventions to improve adherence, inappropriate prescribing and prescribing errors.

Areas of controversy: Interventions tend to be specific to a particular stage of the pathway and/or to a particular disease and have mostly been evaluated for their effect on intermediate or process outcomes.

Growing points: Medicines optimization offers an opportunity to improve health outcomes and efficiency of healthcare.

Areas timely for developing research: The available evidence is insufficient to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interventions to address suboptimal medicine use in the UK NHS. Decision modelling, evidence synthesis and elicitation have the potential to address the evidence gaps and help prioritize research.

Keywords: cost-effectiveness; economics; medicines management; medicines optimization; review.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Drug Prescriptions / economics*
  • Drug Prescriptions / standards
  • Evidence-Based Medicine / methods
  • Health Services Research / methods*
  • Humans
  • Medication Adherence
  • Medication Errors / prevention & control
  • Policy Making*
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians' / economics
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians' / standards
  • State Medicine / economics
  • State Medicine / standards
  • United Kingdom