A systematic investigation of computation models for predicting Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs)

PLoS One. 2014 Sep 2;9(9):e105889. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105889. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

Background: Early and accurate identification of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) is critically important for drug development and clinical safety. Computer-aided prediction of ADRs has attracted increasing attention in recent years, and many computational models have been proposed. However, because of the lack of systematic analysis and comparison of the different computational models, there remain limitations in designing more effective algorithms and selecting more useful features. There is therefore an urgent need to review and analyze previous computation models to obtain general conclusions that can provide useful guidance to construct more effective computational models to predict ADRs.

Principal findings: In the current study, the main work is to compare and analyze the performance of existing computational methods to predict ADRs, by implementing and evaluating additional algorithms that have been earlier used for predicting drug targets. Our results indicated that topological and intrinsic features were complementary to an extent and the Jaccard coefficient had an important and general effect on the prediction of drug-ADR associations. By comparing the structure of each algorithm, final formulas of these algorithms were all converted to linear model in form, based on this finding we propose a new algorithm called the general weighted profile method and it yielded the best overall performance among the algorithms investigated in this paper.

Conclusion: Several meaningful conclusions and useful findings regarding the prediction of ADRs are provided for selecting optimal features and algorithms.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems
  • Algorithms
  • Area Under Curve
  • Computer Simulation*
  • Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions*
  • Humans

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21375095) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21305096). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.