Validation of the principles of injury risk zones for motorcycle protective clothing

J Safety Res. 2014 Sep:50:83-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2014.04.003. Epub 2014 May 9.

Abstract

Introduction: The distributions of motorcycle crash impacts and injuries were compared to the four impact risk zones and protective performance specified in the European Standard for motorcycle clothing (EN 13595).

Methods: Crashed motorcyclists' (n=117) injuries and clothing damage were categorized by body area into the four risk zones. Three levels of protection were defined: protective clothing with impact protection, protective clothing only and non-protective clothing.

Results: The distribution of impact/injury sites corresponded to the predictions of EN 13595, with the proportion of all injuries decreasing from 43.9% in Zone 1, to 18.0%, 16.7%, and 11.5% in Zones 2 to 4, respectively. Protective clothing modified the distribution of injuries with substantially more injuries (OR=2.69, 95% CL: 20.1-3.59) at unprotected impact sites.

Practical application: These findings support an appropriate framework for determining performance specifications for the manufacture of motorcycle clothing that will effectively reduce the risk of injury in crashes.

Keywords: Injury; Motorcycle; Protective clothing; Rider; Standards.

Publication types

  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Accidents, Traffic / statistics & numerical data*
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Australian Capital Territory / epidemiology
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Emergency Service, Hospital / statistics & numerical data*
  • Humans
  • Interviews as Topic
  • Logistic Models
  • Middle Aged
  • Motorcycles / statistics & numerical data*
  • Odds Ratio
  • Protective Clothing / standards
  • Protective Clothing / statistics & numerical data*
  • Wounds and Injuries / classification*
  • Wounds and Injuries / epidemiology
  • Wounds and Injuries / etiology
  • Young Adult