Is ileostomy always necessary following rectal resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis?

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Jan;22(1):103-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.08.001. Epub 2014 Aug 7.

Abstract

Objective: To verify the hypothesis that in most patients bowel segmental resection to treat endometriosis can be safely performed without creation of a stoma and to discuss the limitations of this statement.

Design: Retrospective study (Canadian Task Force classification III).

Setting: Tertiary referral center.

Patients: Forty-one women with sigmoid and rectal endometriotic lesions who underwent segmental resection.

Intervention: Segmental resection procedures performed between 2004 and 2011. Patient demographic, operative, and postoperative data were compared.

Measurements and main results: Sigmoid resection was performed in 6 patients (15%), and rectal anterior resection in 35 patients (high in 21 patients [51%], and low, i.e., <10 cm from the anal verge, in 14 [34%]). In 4 patients a temporary ileostomy was created. There was 1 anastomotic leak (2.4%), in a patient with an unprotected anastomosis, which was treated via laparoscopic surgery and creation of a temporary ileostomy. Other postoperative complications included hemoperitoneum, pelvic abscess, pelvic collection, and a ureteral vaginal fistula, in 1 patient each (all 2.4%).

Conclusion: A protective stoma may be averted in low anastomosis if it is >5 cm from the anal verge and there are no adverse intraoperative events.

Keywords: Anastomotic leak; Bowel endometriosis; Colorectal resection; Ileostomy.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Anastomotic Leak / epidemiology
  • Case-Control Studies
  • Colectomy / methods*
  • Endometriosis / surgery*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Ileostomy / methods*
  • Laparoscopy / methods
  • Middle Aged
  • Postoperative Complications / epidemiology*
  • Rectal Diseases / surgery*
  • Rectum / surgery*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Sigmoid Diseases / surgery*
  • Young Adult