Clinical- and cost-effectiveness of LDL particle-guided statin therapy: a simulation study

Atherosclerosis. 2014 Sep;236(1):154-61. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.06.027. Epub 2014 Jul 7.

Abstract

We used the Archimedes Model, a mathematical simulation model (Model) to estimate the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of using LDL particle concentration (LDL-P) as an adjunct or alternative to LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) to guide statin therapy. LDL-P by NMR has been shown to be a better measure of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk than LDL-C, and may therefore be a better gauge of the need for and response to statin treatment. Using the Model, we conducted a virtual clinical trial comparing the use of LDL-C alone, LDL-P alone, and LDL-C and LDL-P together to guide treatment in the general adult population, and in high-risk, dyslipidemic subpopulations. In the general population, the 5-year major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) relative risk reduction (RRR) of LDL-P alone compared to the control arm (LDL-C alone) was 5.0% (95% CI, 4.7-5.3; p < .0001); using both LDL-C and LDL-P (dual markers) led to 3.0% RRR compared to the control arm (95% CI, 2.8-3.3; p < .0001). For individuals with diabetes, the RRR was 7.3% (95% CI, 6.4-8.2; p < .0001) for LDL-P alone and 6.9% for dual markers (95% CI, 6.1-7.8; both, p < .0001). In the general population, the costs per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) associated with the use of LDL-P alone were $76,052 at 5 years and $8913 at 20 years and $142,825 at 5 years and $25,505 at 20 years with the use of both markers. In high-risk subpopulations, the use of LDL-P alone was cost-saving at 5 years; whereas the cost per QALY for the use of both markers was $14,250 at 5 years and $859 at 20 years for high-risk dyslipidemics, $19,192 at 5 years and $649 at 20 years for diabetics, and $9030 at 5 years and $7268 at 20 years for patients with prior CHD. In conclusion, the model estimates that using LDL-P to guide statin therapy may reduce the risk of CVD events to a greater extent than does the use of LDL-C alone and maybe cost-effective or cost-saving for high-risk patients.

Keywords: Cholesterol; Hypercholesterolemia; Hyperlipoproteinemia; LDL particle; LDL-P; Lipoprotein; Statin.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Anticholesteremic Agents / economics
  • Anticholesteremic Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Atorvastatin
  • Cardiovascular Diseases / economics
  • Cardiovascular Diseases / mortality
  • Cardiovascular Diseases / prevention & control
  • Comorbidity
  • Computer Simulation*
  • Cost Savings
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Diabetes Mellitus / blood
  • Drug Costs
  • Drug Substitution
  • Dyslipidemias / blood
  • Dyslipidemias / diet therapy
  • Dyslipidemias / drug therapy*
  • Dyslipidemias / economics
  • Heptanoic Acids / administration & dosage
  • Heptanoic Acids / therapeutic use
  • Humans
  • Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors / economics
  • Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors / therapeutic use*
  • Hypercholesterolemia / blood
  • Hypercholesterolemia / diet therapy
  • Hypercholesterolemia / drug therapy
  • Hypercholesterolemia / economics
  • Life Style
  • Lipoproteins, LDL / blood*
  • Medicare / economics
  • Models, Cardiovascular*
  • Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Biomolecular / methods*
  • Pyrroles / administration & dosage
  • Pyrroles / therapeutic use
  • Quality-Adjusted Life Years
  • Risk
  • Risk Reduction Behavior
  • Simvastatin / administration & dosage
  • Simvastatin / therapeutic use
  • Treatment Outcome
  • United States

Substances

  • Anticholesteremic Agents
  • Heptanoic Acids
  • Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
  • Lipoproteins, LDL
  • Pyrroles
  • Atorvastatin
  • Simvastatin