Decreased camptothecin sensitivity of the stem-cell-like fraction of Caco2 cells correlates with an altered phosphorylation pattern of topoisomerase I

PLoS One. 2014 Jun 24;9(6):e99628. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099628. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

The CD44+ and CD44- subpopulations of the colorectal cancer cell line Caco2 were analyzed separately for their sensitivities to the antitumor drug camptothecin. CD44+ cells were less sensitive to camptothecin than CD44- cells. The relative resistance of CD44+ cells was correlated with (i) reduced activity of the nuclear enzyme topoisomerase I and (ii) insensitivity of this enzyme to camptothecin when analyzed in extracts. In contrast, topoisomerase I activity was higher in extracts from CD44- cells and the enzyme was camptothecin sensitive. Topoisomerase I from the two subpopulations were differentially phosphorylated in a manner that appeared to determine the drug sensitivity and activity of the enzyme. This finding was further supported by the fact that phosphorylation of topoisomerase I in CD44+ cell extract by protein kinase CK2 converted the enzyme to a camptothecin sensitive, more active form mimicking topoisomerase I in extracts from CD44- cells. Conversely, dephosphorylation of topoisomerase I in extracts from CD44- cells rendered the enzyme less active and camptothecin resistant. These findings add to our understanding of chemotherapy resistance in the Caco2 CD44+ cancer stem cell model.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic / pharmacology*
  • Caco-2 Cells
  • Camptothecin / pharmacology*
  • DNA Topoisomerases, Type I / metabolism*
  • Drug Resistance, Neoplasm*
  • Humans
  • Hyaluronan Receptors / metabolism
  • Neoplastic Stem Cells / drug effects
  • Phosphorylation / drug effects

Substances

  • Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic
  • CD44 protein, human
  • Hyaluronan Receptors
  • DNA Topoisomerases, Type I
  • TOP1 protein, human
  • Camptothecin

Grants and funding

This research was supported by the Carlsberg Foundation (post doc grant for AR), the Danish Cancer Society, Aase og Ejnar Danielsens Foundation, the Fabrikant Einar Willumsens Mindelegat, the Friedrich Wilhelm Frank & Hustru Angelina Franks Mindelegat, the Arvid Nilssons Foundation, the Minister Erna Hamiltons Legat for Videnskab og Kunst, the Familien Erichsens Mindefond, Karen Elise Jensen's Foundation, Dagmar Marshall's Foundation, Dir. Einar Hansen & Vera Hansen's Foundation, The Harboe Foundation, Louis Hansen's Foundation, The Hørslev Foundation, Købmand Sven Hansen & hustru Ina Hansen's Foundation, Dir. Emil Hertz & hustru Inger Hertz' Foundation, Civilingeniør Frode Nygaard's Foundation, Kong Christian den Tiende's Foundation, The Gangsted Foundation, KU's Foundation for Cancer research, Ludvig og Franciska Andersen's Foundation, Frimodt-Heineke's Foundation, the Familien Hede Nielsens Foundation, the Marie & M. B. Richters Foundation, the Lykfeldts legat, the Fhv. Dir. Leo Nielsen og Hustru Karen Margrethe Nielsens Legat for Lægevidenskabelig Grundforskning. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.