The role of abiotic environmental conditions and herbivory in shaping bacterial community composition in floral nectar

PLoS One. 2014 Jun 12;9(6):e99107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099107. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

Identifying the processes that drive community assembly has long been a central theme in ecology. For microorganisms, a traditional prevailing hypothesis states that "everything is everywhere, but the environment selects". Although the bacterial community in floral nectar may be affected by both atmosphere (air-borne bacteria) and animals as dispersal vectors, the environmental and geographic factors that shape microbial communities in floral nectar are unknown. We studied culturable bacterial communities in Asphodelus aestivus floral nectar and in its typical herbivorous bug Capsodes infuscatus, along an aridity gradient. Bacteria were sampled from floral nectar and bugs at four sites, spanning a geographical range of 200 km from Mediterranean to semi-arid conditions, under open and bagged flower treatments. In agreement with the niche assembly hypothesis, the differences in bacterial community compositions were explained by differences in abiotic environmental conditions. These results suggest that microbial model systems are useful for addressing macro-ecological questions. In addition, similar bacterial communities were found in the nectar and on the surface of the bugs that were documented visiting the flowers. These similarities imply that floral nectar bacteria dispersal is shaped not only by air borne bacteria and nectar consumers as previously reported, but also by visiting vectors like the mirid bugs.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Climate
  • Flowers / microbiology*
  • Hemiptera / microbiology
  • Hemiptera / physiology
  • Herbivory*
  • Liliaceae / microbiology*
  • Microbiota*
  • Plant Nectar*

Substances

  • Plant Nectar

Grants and funding

This study was supported by grants from the Israel Science Foundation (ISF, grants no. 189/08 and 1094/12). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.