Odor valence linearly modulates attractiveness, but not age assessment, of invariant facial features in a memory-based rating task

PLoS One. 2014 May 29;9(5):e98347. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098347. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

Scented cosmetic products are used across cultures as a way to favorably influence one's appearance. While crossmodal effects of odor valence on perceived attractiveness of facial features have been demonstrated experimentally, it is unknown whether they represent a phenomenon specific to affective processing. In this experiment, we presented odors in the context of a face battery with systematic feature manipulations during a speeded response task. Modulatory effects of linear increases of odor valence were investigated by juxtaposing subsequent memory-based ratings tasks--one predominantly affective (attractiveness) and a second, cognitive (age). The linear modulation pattern observed for attractiveness was consistent with additive effects of face and odor appraisal. Effects of odor valence on age perception were not linearly modulated and may be the result of cognitive interference. Affective and cognitive processing of faces thus appear to differ in their susceptibility to modulation by odors, likely as a result of privileged access of olfactory stimuli to affective brain networks. These results are critically discussed with respect to potential biases introduced by the preceding speeded response task.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Facial Expression*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Memory*
  • Odorants*
  • Pheromones, Human*
  • Reaction Time
  • Smell
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Pheromones, Human

Grants and funding

This study was funded in part by an investigator-initiated grant from the Unilever Corporation. JNL is funded by the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation (KAW 2012.0141) and a grant from the Swedish Research Council (VRHS2009-2337). JS is funded by a research fellowship by the German Research Foundation (DFG, SE 2147-1). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.