Safety and efficacy of different paclitaxel-eluting balloons in a porcine model

Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2014 Jun;67(6):456-62. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2013.09.030. Epub 2014 Feb 13.

Abstract

Introduction and objectives: Paclitaxel-eluting balloons have shown high antiproliferative efficacy in the treatment and prevention of restenosis. Nevertheless, not all available devices are equally effective, which makes it interesting to compare results in a preclinical model. Our objective was to assess the preclinical efficacy and safety of different devices.

Methods: We implanted 51 metallic stents (Architect(®), iVascular) in 17 domestic swine (mean, 25 [3] kg), inserting 1 stent per major coronary artery. Stent postdilatation was performed with different control balloons (n=10) or paclitaxel-eluting balloons: paclitaxel-eluting balloon 1 (iVascular) (n=15); paclitaxel-eluting balloon 2 (iVascular) (n=16) and In.Pact Falcon(®) (Medtronic) (n=10). The restenosis rate (using angiography and histomorphometry) and vascular healing parameters (balloon-related vascular injury score, endothelialization rate, and fibrin and inflammation scores) were analyzed at 28 days.

Results: The distinct paclitaxel-eluting balloons showed a similar degree of stenosis at follow-up, which was significantly lower than that in the control group: diameter stenosis was 9% (12%) vs 34% (18%) by angiography (P<.0001) and was 22% (8%) vs 51% (18%) by histomorphometry (P<.0001). Scores for vascular injury (mean, 0.6 [0.5]) and inflammation (mean, 0.8 [0.3]) were uniformly low across all groups. Drug effect markers differed significantly between the paclitaxel-eluting balloons and control groups, with lower endothelialization rates (87% [10%] vs 99% [2%]; P=.0007) and higher fibrin scores (2.1 [0.7] vs 0.4 [0.5]; P<.0001) in the paclitaxel-eluting balloons groups. There were no differences between the different paclitaxel-eluting balloons.

Conclusions: In this preclinical model, the paclitaxel-eluting balloons studied significantly reduced in-stent restenosis compared with the control balloons. Although there were no findings of persistent vascular injury or inflammation, delayed endothelialization and fibrin aggregate suggest a drug deposition response.

Keywords: Animal model; Balón liberador de paclitaxel; Modelo animal; Paclitaxel-eluting balloon; Reparación vascular; Restenosis; Stent; Vascular healing.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Coronary Restenosis / drug therapy
  • Drug-Eluting Stents / adverse effects*
  • Models, Animal
  • Paclitaxel / administration & dosage*
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Swine
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Paclitaxel