Regime shift in fertilizer commodities indicates more turbulence ahead for food security

PLoS One. 2014 May 1;9(5):e93998. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093998. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

Recent human population increase has been enabled by a massive expansion of global agricultural production. A key component of this "Green Revolution" has been application of inorganic fertilizers to produce and maintain high crop yields. However, the long-term sustainability of these practices is unclear given the eutrophying effects of fertilizer runoff as well as the reliance of fertilizer production on finite non-renewable resources such as mined phosphate- and potassium-bearing rocks. Indeed, recent volatility in food and agricultural commodity prices, especially phosphate fertilizer, has raised concerns about emerging constraints on fertilizer production with consequences for its affordability in the developing world. We examined 30 years of monthly prices of fertilizer commodities (phosphate rock, urea, and potassium) for comparison with three food commodities (maize, wheat, and rice) and three non-agricultural commodities (gold, nickel, and petroleum). Here we show that all commodity prices, except gold, had significant change points between 2007-2009, but the fertilizer commodities, and especially phosphate rock, showed multiple symptoms of nonlinear critical transitions. In contrast to fertilizers and to rice, maize and wheat prices did not show significant signs of nonlinear dynamics. From these results we infer a recent emergence of a scarcity price in global fertilizer markets, a result signaling a new high price regime for these essential agricultural inputs. Such a regime will challenge on-going efforts to establish global food security but may also prompt fertilizer use practices and nutrient recovery strategies that reduce eutrophication.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Agriculture*
  • Fertilizers*
  • Food Supply* / economics
  • Humans

Substances

  • Fertilizers

Grants and funding

J.J.E. is grateful for support from the Arizona State University Sustainable Phosphorus Initiative and the US National Science Foundation (NSF). S.R.C. acknowledges support of the NSF from North Temperate Lakes LTER and the Water Sustainability and Climate program. W.B. is supported by the Vilas Trust and the NSF Center for Robust Decision Making on Climate Change and Energy Policy. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.