Homophily and the speed of social mobilization: the effect of acquired and ascribed traits

PLoS One. 2014 Apr 16;9(4):e95140. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095140. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

Large-scale mobilization of individuals across social networks is becoming increasingly prevalent in society. However, little is known about what affects the speed of social mobilization. Here we use a framed field experiment to identify and measure properties of individuals and their relationships that predict mobilization speed. We ran a global social mobilization contest and recorded personal traits of the participants and those they recruited. We studied the effects of ascribed traits (gender, age) and acquired traits (geography, and information source) on the speed of mobilization. We found that homophily, a preference for interacting with other individuals with similar traits, had a mixed role in social mobilization. Homophily was present for acquired traits, in which mobilization speed was faster when the recuiter and recruit had the same trait compared to different traits. In contrast, we did not find support for homophily for the ascribed traits. Instead, those traits had other, non-homophily effects: Females mobilized other females faster than males mobilized other males. Younger recruiters mobilized others faster, and older recruits mobilized slower. Recruits also mobilized faster when they first heard about the contest directly from the contest organization, and decreased in speed when hearing from less personal source types (e.g. family vs. media). These findings show that social mobilization includes dynamics that are unlike other, more passive forms of social activity propagation. These findings suggest relevant factors for engineering social mobilization tasks for increased speed.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Age Factors
  • Aged
  • Female
  • Friends / psychology*
  • Humans
  • Information Dissemination
  • Interpersonal Relations*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Psychological Distance
  • Sex Factors
  • Social Networking*
  • Social Support*
  • Time Factors

Grants and funding

The authors were partially funded by the NIH-Oxford-Cambridge Scholarship Program and by the John Norris Maguire Professorship in Information Technologies Chair account. Langley Castle Hotel funded the awards for the contest used in this study and gathered the data. Other than this, the funders had no role in the subsequent study design, data analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.