Comparison between oscillometric and intra-arterial blood pressure measurements in ill preterm and full-term neonates

J Am Soc Hypertens. 2014 Jan;8(1):36-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2013.10.003. Epub 2013 Oct 11.

Abstract

Conflicting data exist regarding the accuracy of the oscillometric method of blood pressure (BP) measurement in neonates. There is limited data regarding intra-arterial BP trends in neonates. We aimed to determine the accuracy of oscillometric BP measurements and to evaluate the BP distributions in ill neonates. A total of 1492 simultaneously obtained oscillometric and intra-arterial (umbilical arterial [UAC] or radial arterial) BP measurements were used for comparisons and 125,580 intra-arterial BP readings were used to the evaluate BP distribution. There was a statistically significant difference (P < .0001) between the oscillometric and radial mean arterial BP (MAP) 4.8 ± 9.8 mm Hg, systolic BP 8.3 ± 11.6 mm Hg, diastolic BP 4.3 ± 9.3 mm Hg and between the oscillometric and UAC systolic BP 5.2 ± 11.9 mm Hg and diastolic BP -0.8 ± 10.4 mm Hg. The MAP increased with increases in weight (35.3 ± 4.92 mm Hg/kg), post-menstrual age (-0.29 ± 1.41 mm Hg/week) and advanced gestational age at birth (13.12 ± 0.90 mm Hg/week). Oscillometric BP measurements are not equivalent to the intra-arterial (UAC or radial arterial) BP in ill neonates. The BP increases with increase in weight, gestational age at birth, and post-menstrual age in ill neonates.

Keywords: Accuracy; invasive blood pressure; non-invasive blood pressure.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Arterial Pressure / physiology*
  • Blood Pressure Determination / methods*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Infant, Newborn, Diseases / physiopathology*
  • Infant, Premature*
  • Intensive Care Units, Neonatal
  • Male
  • Oscillometry / methods*
  • Prospective Studies