Ecoinformatics reveals effects of crop rotational histories on cotton yield

PLoS One. 2014 Jan 17;9(1):e85710. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085710. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

Crop rotation has been practiced for centuries in an effort to improve agricultural yield. However, the directions, magnitudes, and mechanisms of the yield effects of various crop rotations remain poorly understood in many systems. In order to better understand how crop rotation influences cotton yield, we used hierarchical Bayesian models to analyze a large ecoinformatics database consisting of records of commercial cotton crops grown in California's San Joaquin Valley. We identified several crops that, when grown in a field the year before a cotton crop, were associated with increased or decreased cotton yield. Furthermore, there was a negative association between the effect of the prior year's crop on June densities of the pest Lygus hesperus and the effect of the prior year's crop on cotton yield. This suggested that some crops may enhance L. hesperus densities in the surrounding agricultural landscape, because residual L. hesperus populations from the previous year cannot continuously inhabit a focal field and attack a subsequent cotton crop. In addition, we found that cotton yield declined approximately 2.4% for each additional year in which cotton was grown consecutively in a field prior to the focal cotton crop. Because L. hesperus is quite mobile, the effects of crop rotation on L. hesperus would likely not be revealed by small plot experimentation. These results provide an example of how ecoinformatics datasets, which capture the true spatial scale of commercial agriculture, can be used to enhance agricultural productivity.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Agriculture / methods*
  • Animals
  • California
  • Crops, Agricultural / growth & development*
  • Crops, Agricultural / parasitology
  • Ecosystem*
  • Gossypium / growth & development*
  • Gossypium / parasitology
  • Heteroptera / physiology
  • Models, Biological

Grants and funding

Funding Sources: 1. California State Support Committee of Cotton Incorporated. URL: http://www.ccgga.org/cotton_research/cssc.htm. 2. University of California Statewide IPM Program. URL: http://www.ipm.ucdavis.edu. 3. USDA-NRICGP (Grant 2006-01761). URL: http://www.csrees.usda.gov/funding/rfas/nri_rfa.html. 4. California Department of Pesticide Regulation. URL: http://www.cdpr.ca.gov. 5. National Science Foundation GRFP (Grant DGE-1148897). URL: http://www.nsfgrfp.org. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.