Is long-term beta-blocker therapy for myocardial infarction survivors still relevant in the era of primary percutaneous coronary intervention?

Isr Med Assoc J. 2013 Dec;15(12):770-4.

Abstract

Studies on trials conducted before the use of thrombolysis demonstrated both short- and long-term benefits of beta-blockers, and one meta-analysis of those trials showed a 25% reduction in 1 year mortality. Treatment with beta-blockers was and continues to be recommended for patients after ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), but many patients failed to receive these agents mostly because physicians were unconvinced of their benefit. A similar analysis of the studies in STEMI patients treated with thrombolysis also showed an overall 23% reduction in mortality associated with beta-blocker use in the era of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In the present review, we examine the relationship between the pharmacology of beta-blockers and their potential utility in order to review early trials on their post-infarct efficacy and to place these findings in the context of this specific patient population in the era of primary PCI.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Adrenergic beta-Antagonists* / pharmacology
  • Adrenergic beta-Antagonists* / therapeutic use
  • Comparative Effectiveness Research
  • Electrocardiography
  • Humans
  • Mortality
  • Myocardial Infarction* / diagnosis
  • Myocardial Infarction* / mortality
  • Myocardial Infarction* / therapy
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention* / methods
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention* / statistics & numerical data
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Survivors / statistics & numerical data
  • Thrombolytic Therapy* / methods
  • Thrombolytic Therapy* / statistics & numerical data
  • Time

Substances

  • Adrenergic beta-Antagonists