The reliability of a scoring system for corrosion and fretting, and its relationship to material loss of tapered, modular junctions of retrieved hip implants

J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jun;29(6):1313-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.12.003. Epub 2013 Dec 10.

Abstract

It has been suggested that corrosion and fretting at the tapered, modular junctions of hip arthroplasties may contribute to implant failure. In this study the reliability of a commonly used peer-reviewed scoring system for visual assessment of corrosion and fretting at these junctions was evaluated. Volumetric material loss at the tapered head surface was measured and associations with the visual scores were investigated. We found that the inter-observer reproducibility and single-observer repeatability of the corrosion scores were substantial using Cohen's weighted Kappa statistic (k = 0.64-0.71). The reproducibility and repeatability of the fretting scores however were slight to fair (k = 0.18-0.31). Taper corrosion scores were significantly and moderately correlated with the volume of material loss measured (Spearman's r = 0.59; P < 0.001). We recommend the continued use of this scoring system but it should not be a substitute for measurement of material loss.

Keywords: corrosion; fretting; hip; metal-on-metal; taper; wear.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / adverse effects
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / instrumentation
  • Corrosion
  • Device Removal
  • Equipment Failure Analysis
  • Female
  • Femur / surgery
  • Hip Prosthesis / adverse effects*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Materials Testing
  • Middle Aged
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Prosthesis Failure*
  • Reoperation
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Retrospective Studies