How to isolate urothelial cells? Comparison of four different methods and literature review

Hum Cell. 2014 Apr;27(2):85-93. doi: 10.1007/s13577-013-0070-y. Epub 2013 Dec 25.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to present the comparison of four different methods for urothelial cell isolation and culture and compare them to methods cited in the literature. Four different techniques were examined for urothelium isolation from rat bladders. Isolation effectiveness was calculated using trypan blue assay. Confirmation of isolated cell phenotype and comparison with native bladder tissue was confirmed using immunohistochemical (IHC), immunocytochemical (ICC) and immunofluorescence (IF) analysis. The method with bladder inversion and collagenase P digestion resulted in the highest number of isolated cells. These cells showed positive expression of cytokeratin 7, 8, 18, α6-integrin and p63. Our results and the literature review showed that the best method for urothelium bladder isolation is dissection of the epithelium layer from other bladder parts and digestion of mechanically prepared tissue in a collagenase solution.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Cell Separation / methods*
  • Cells, Cultured
  • Collagenases / metabolism
  • Integrin alpha6 / metabolism
  • Keratin-18 / metabolism
  • Keratin-7 / metabolism
  • Keratin-8 / metabolism
  • Male
  • Rats
  • Rats, Wistar
  • Regeneration
  • Solutions
  • Urinary Bladder / cytology*
  • Urothelium / cytology*
  • Urothelium / metabolism
  • Urothelium / physiology

Substances

  • Integrin alpha6
  • Keratin-18
  • Keratin-7
  • Keratin-8
  • Solutions
  • Collagenases