Comparison of reasorbeable mini anchor versus non reasorbeable: histological evaluation in an experimental rabbit model

Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2013 Aug 11;3(3):204-9. eCollection 2013 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose: Experimental animal study to evaluate the osseo integration, inflammatory response, dislocation and the reabsorption timing of the reasorbeable Mitek(®) mini anchor, in comparison with the non reasorbeable titanium based.

Methods: TWENTY RABBITS WERE USED: divided into two groups of ten. Each animal underwent sectioning and reinsertion of the Achilles tendon bilaterally, using a reasorbeable mini anchor on one side and a controlateral non reasorbeable mini anchor. The first group was sacrificed after 40 days and the other after 120 days. The bone tendon complex was subjected to histological study.

Results: No histological and statistical significative difference were observed in each group, with a lower inflammation response in the reasorbeable implant. Electronic microscopy evaluation demonstrates good stability of the implant in each group. At day 120 the reasorbeable anchors were not yet disappeared.

Conclusion: Reasorbeable Mitek mini anchors are to be considered to guarantee a similar response and similar bone stability than non reasorbeable ones.

Keywords: anchor; osseointegration; rabbit; reabsorption; tendon.