Live birth from slow-frozen rabbit oocytes after in vivo fertilisation

PLoS One. 2013 Dec 17;8(12):e83399. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083399. eCollection 2013.

Abstract

In vivo fertilisation techniques such as intraoviductal oocyte transfer have been considered as alternatives to bypass the inadequacy of conventional in vitro fertilisation in rabbit. There is only one study in the literature, published in 1989, that reports live offspring from cryopreserved rabbit oocytes. The aim of the present study was to establish the in vivo fertilisation procedure to generate live offspring with frozen oocytes. First, the effect of two recipient models (i) ovariectomised or (ii) oviduct ligated immediately after transfer on the ability of fresh oocytes to fertilise were compared. Second, generation of live offspring from slow-frozen oocytes was carried out using the ligated oviduct recipient model. Throughout the experiment, recipients were artificially inseminated 9 hours prior to oocyte transfer. In the first experiment, two days after unilateral transfer of fresh oocytes, oviducts and uterine horns were flushed to assess embryo recovery rates. The embryo recovery rates were low compared to control in both ovariectomised and ligated oviduct groups. However, ligated oviduct recipient showed significantly (P<0.05) higher embryo recovery rates compared to ovariectomised and control-transferred. In the second experiment, using bilateral oviduct ligation model, all females that received slow-frozen oocytes became pregnant and delivered a total of 4 live young naturally. Thus, in vivo fertilisation is an effective technique to generate live offspring using slow-frozen oocytes in rabbits.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Cryopreservation / methods*
  • Embryo Transfer / veterinary
  • Female
  • Fertilization in Vitro / methods*
  • Fertilization in Vitro / veterinary
  • Freezing
  • Live Birth* / veterinary
  • Oocyte Retrieval / veterinary
  • Oocytes*
  • Ovariectomy / veterinary
  • Pregnancy
  • Rabbits
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sterilization, Tubal / veterinary

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the Spanish Research Project AGL2011-30170-C02-01 (CICYT) and by funds from the Generalitat Valenciana Research Programme (Prometeo 2009/125). Estrella Jiménez was supported by a research grant from the Education Ministry of the Valencian Regional Government (programme VALi+d (ACIF/2010/262). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.