Seroprevalence and potential risk factors for Brucella spp. infection in traditional cattle, sheep and goats reared in urban, periurban and rural areas of Niger

PLoS One. 2013 Dec 16;8(12):e83175. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083175. eCollection 2013.

Abstract

Introduction: In Niamey, Niger, interactions within the interface between animals, humans and the environment induce a potential risk of brucellosis transmission between animals and from animals to humans. Currently, little is known about the transmission of Brucella in this context.

Results: 5,192 animals from 681 herds were included in the study. Serum samples and hygroma fluids were collected. A household survey enabled to identify the risk factors for transmission of brucellosis. The true adjusted herd-level prevalence of brucellosis ranged between 11.2% and 17.2% and the true adjusted animal-population level prevalence was 1.3% (95% CI: 0.9-1.8%) based on indirect ELISA test for Brucella antibodies. Animals aged of 1-4 years were found to be more susceptible than animals less than 1 year old (Odds ratio [OR] of 2.7; 95% CI: 1.43-5.28). For cattle, the odds of brucellosis seropositivity were higher in rural compared to the periurban areas (OR of 2.8; 95% CI: 1.48-5.17) whereas for small ruminants the risk of seropositivity appeared to be higher in urban compared to periurban areas (OR of 5.5; 95% CI: 1.48-20.38). At herd level, the risk of transmission was increased by transhumance (OR of 5.4; 95% CI: 2.84-10.41), the occurrence of abortions (OR of 3.0; 95% CI: 1.40-6.41), and for herds having more than 50 animals (OR of 11.0; 95% CI: 3.75-32.46). Brucella abortus biovar 3 was isolated from the hygromas.

Conclusion: brucellosis in Niger is a serious problem among cattle especially in the rural areas around Niamey and among sheep in the urban areas of Niamey. The seroprevalence varies across strata and animal species with important risk factors including herd size, abortion and transhumance at herd level and age at animal population level. For effective control of brucellosis, an integrated approach seems appropriate involving all stakeholders working in public and animal health.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animal Husbandry
  • Animals
  • Antibodies, Bacterial / blood
  • Brucella / immunology
  • Brucellosis / blood
  • Brucellosis / epidemiology*
  • Brucellosis / etiology*
  • Brucellosis / veterinary*
  • Cattle
  • Cattle Diseases / blood
  • Cattle Diseases / epidemiology
  • Cattle Diseases / etiology
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Goat Diseases / blood
  • Goat Diseases / epidemiology
  • Goat Diseases / etiology
  • Goats
  • Humans
  • Niger / epidemiology
  • Risk Factors
  • Rural Population / statistics & numerical data
  • Seroepidemiologic Studies
  • Sheep
  • Sheep Diseases / blood
  • Sheep Diseases / epidemiology
  • Sheep Diseases / etiology
  • Urban Population

Substances

  • Antibodies, Bacterial

Grants and funding

The authors wish to thank the Belgian Directorate for Development (DGD) for funding this study and VAR-Belgium for the contribution in the laboratory tests. DGD had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. VAR had a role in the analysis and preparation of the manuscript.