[Comparison of clinical outcome of mild-stimulation and conventional ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET)]

Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2013 Dec 18;45(6):892-5.
[Article in Chinese]

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the practical application value of the mild-stimulation method used in in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) treatment for IVF patients with normal ovarian function.

Methods: The patients (ages from 26 to 38 years) with normal ovarian function, who were treated with IVF-ET in Affiliated Reproductive Center of China Medical University from January 2004 to July 2012 were selected as our samples. We compared the clinical results of treatment between the mild-stimulation (104 cycles in experimental group) and the conventional stimulation (198 cycles in control group).

Results: The number of retrieved oocytes (3.1±1.6 vs. 10.2±5.7, P<0.05) and clinical pregnancy rate [34% (33/97) vs. 49.7% (93/187), P<0.05] of the mild-stimulation group (104 cycles) were lower than those of the control group (198 cycles), however, the duration of stimulation (4.7±2.1 vs. 9.16±1.87) and total doses of 75 U gonadotropins used (5.7±3.7 vs. 30.9±10.3) were also lower in the mild-stimulation group than in the control group obviously (P<0.05).

Conclusion: For the normal ovarian function patients, the mild-stimulation method has clear clinical effects, but not as good as the conventional-stimulation one.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • English Abstract
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Clomiphene / pharmacology*
  • Embryo Transfer*
  • Female
  • Fertilization in Vitro*
  • Gonadotropins / administration & dosage
  • Gonadotropins / pharmacology*
  • Humans
  • Infertility, Female / therapy
  • Ovulation Induction / methods*
  • Pregnancy
  • Pregnancy Rate

Substances

  • Gonadotropins
  • Clomiphene