Introduction: It has been reported that the time between symptom onset and objective diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) does not affect patients' prognosis with regard to re-thrombosis and mortality risk. However, this observation is contra-intuitive and poorly understood. We further elaborated on this paradox by evaluating thrombus load and right ventricular function in patients with and without diagnostic delay.
Materials and methods: We performed a post hoc analysis of a previously published observational prospective outcome study in 113 consecutive PE patients. Qanadli-score and RV/LV ratio were scored in all patients, as was the duration from symptom onset to clinical presentation and diagnosis. Diagnostic delay was defined as a period of more than 7 days between symptom onset and clinical presentation. Further endpoints were mortality and hospital readmission in a 6-week follow-up period.
Results: Twenty patients with and 93 patients without delay were studied, who had comparable baseline characteristics and co-morbidities. In linear analyses, Qanadli-score (R² of 0.021; P = 0.130) and RV/LV ratio (R² < 0.001; P = 0.991) were not associated with diagnostic delay. Likewise, longer delay was not predictive of 6-week mortality (odds ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.08-5.57) or hospital readmission (odds ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.15-3.65).
Conclusion: In our patient cohort, diagnostic delay was not associated with higher thrombus load or right ventricular dysfunction. This provides a possible explanation for the lack of prognostic relevance of diagnostic delay.
Keywords: delayed diagnosis; multidetector computed tomography; outcomes assessment; pulmonary embolism; ventricular function, right.
© 2013 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.