Are lifestyle interventions in primary care cost-effective?--An analysis based on a Markov model, differences-in-differences approach and the Swedish Björknäs study

PLoS One. 2013 Nov 14;8(11):e80672. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080672. eCollection 2013.

Abstract

Background: Lifestyle interventions affect patients' risk factors for metabolic syndrome (MeSy), a pre-stage to cardiovascular diseases, diabetes and related complications. An effective lifestyle intervention is the Swedish Björknäs intervention, a 3-year randomized controlled trial in primary care for MeSy patients. To include future disease-related cost and health consequences in a cost-effectiveness analysis, a simulation model was used to estimate the short-term (3-year) and long-term (lifelong) cost-effectiveness of the Björknäs study.

Methodology/ principal findings: A Markov micro-simulation model was used to predict the cost and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for MeSy-related diseases based on ten risk factors. Model inputs were levels of individual risk factors at baseline and at the third year. The model estimated short-term and long-term costs and QALYs for the intervention and control groups. The cost-effectiveness of the intervention was assessed using differences-in-differences approach to compare the changes between the groups in the health care and societal perspectives, using a 3% discount rate. A 95% confidence interval (CI), based on bootstrapping, and sensitivity analyses describe the uncertainty in the estimates. In the short-term, costs are predicted to increase over time in both groups, but less in the intervention group, resulting in an average cost saving/reduction of US$-700 (in 2012, US$1=six point five seven SEK) and US$-500, in the societal and health care perspectives. The long-term estimate also predicts increased costs, but considerably less in the intervention group: US$-7,300 (95% CI: US$-19,700 to US$-1,000) in the societal, and US$-1,500 (95% CI: US$-5,400 to US$2,650) in the health care perspective. As intervention costs were US$211 per participant, the intervention would result in cost saving. Furthermore, in the long-term an estimated 0.46 QALYs (95% CI: 0.12 to 0.69) per participant would be gained.

Conclusions/ significance: The Swedish Björknäs study appears to reduce demands on societal and health care resources and increase health-related quality of life.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Life Style*
  • Male
  • Markov Chains
  • Middle Aged
  • Primary Health Care / economics*
  • Primary Health Care / methods*
  • Quality-Adjusted Life Years
  • Risk Reduction Behavior

Grants and funding

This study was supported by the Health Economics Programme (HEP) at Lund University, which received core funding from FAS (dnr. 2006-1660), the Government Grant for Clinical Research (“ALF”), and Skåne Region (U.G.G.), the Norrbotten Local County Council, Division of Primary Health Care, Luleå, Sweden; Visare Norr, Northern County Councils; Sweden, and the Heart Foundation of Northern Sweden. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.