Influence of cementation and cement type on the fracture load testing methodology of anterior crowns made of different materials

Dent Mater J. 2013;32(6):888-95. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2013-147. Epub 2013 Nov 15.

Abstract

To evaluate the influence of cementation on fracture load of anterior crowns made of CAD/CAM-resin-blocks (ART), leucite-reinforced glass-ceramics (LRG), lithium disilicate ceramics (LIT), veneered zirconia (ZRO) and veneered alloy (DEG). Each crown group (n=15/subgroup) was cemented on the metal abutment as follows: i. using glass ionomer, ii. using self-adhesive resin cement, and iii. not cemented. Crowns were tested and analyzed with 2-way and 1-way ANOVA (Scheffé test), and Weibull statistics (p<0.05). Within LRG, self-adhesive cemented subgroup showed higher fracture load compared to other groups (p<0.001). Among DEG, lower results were measured for non-cemented crowns than for cemented (p<0.001). For ART, LIT and ZRO no influence of cementation was observed. For fracture load test methodology, metal ceramic crowns should be generally cemented. Glass-ceramic crowns should be cemented using adhesive cement. Cementation and cement type did not have an influence on the fracture load results for resin, zirconia or lithium disilicate crowns.

MeSH terms

  • Cementation*
  • Crowns*
  • Dental Cements / chemistry*
  • Dental Cements / classification
  • Humans
  • Materials Testing*
  • Tooth Fractures*

Substances

  • Dental Cements