The shoe fits, but the footprint is larger than earth

PLoS Biol. 2013 Nov;11(11):e1001701. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001701. Epub 2013 Nov 5.

Abstract

In a Formal Comment, Rees and Wackernagel defend their global Ecological Footprint calculations against criticisms in this issue of PLOS Biology that they are potentially misleading.

Publication types

  • Comment

MeSH terms

  • Conservation of Energy Resources / legislation & jurisprudence*
  • Humans

Grants and funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.