A systematic review comparing cognitive-behavioral therapy and contingency management for cocaine dependence

J Addict Dis. 2013;32(3):274-87. doi: 10.1080/10550887.2013.824328.

Abstract

The main objective of this review was to compare the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy and contingency management for cocaine dependence. Contingency management alone reliably reduced cocaine use during active treatment in all cited trials, whereas the positive effect of cognitive-behavioral therapy emerged after treatment in 3 of 5 trials. Synergistic effects of the combination of contingency management plus cognitive-behavioral therapy are shown in 2 trials, but another 3 trials found no additive effects. Positive, rapid, and enduring effects on cocaine use are reliably seen with contingency management interventions, whereas measurable effects of cognitive-behavioral therapy emerge after treatment and are not as reliable as effects with contingency management.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Behavior Therapy / methods*
  • Cocaine-Related Disorders / rehabilitation*
  • Cognitive Behavioral Therapy / methods*
  • Combined Modality Therapy
  • Comparative Effectiveness Research
  • Humans
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic*
  • Reinforcement, Psychology
  • Secondary Prevention
  • Token Economy*
  • Treatment Outcome